![]() ![]() ![]() Time-consuming to HAVE to go over the final results to CORRECT those spikes (NOT Fun)Īlso, odd color-changing NOT included in the donor selection - maybe, maybe not, somewhere else in photo. I've notice in some areas the results came out with little SPIKES at the abutting edge. Which I'm sure you know lines can work, but curves match curves smoother (and therefore, quicker). The protective lines are great, but I've had instances where there are curves. The option of opaqueness could help where abutting areas could be merged, akin to feathering, especially for light airiness intermingling, like hair, fur, etc. The suggestion for the artist's neutral gray background is a good idea, for the reasons given by the earlier reviewers. Like/LOVE the larger actual work area, though! 5.5 was good in that area (takes longer to get to the more clicks, and return to the work area). Also, don't need as much open space around each Tool as you have in Ver 6.0, ver. 6.0 for same job (6.0 going the wrong direction). Of all the things I like the light computer resources (which is why I use Inpaint first over PS on the things Inpaint Can do), most things only need a quick fix, & it's fun to see fast changes (although the amount of fun diminishes w/increased amount of clicks to get the job done.) So an improvement would be is to Reduce the number of Clicks to get the job done - ver. It shows You are also a Good Listener to what your users want. It's obvious your heart is in a job well-done. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |